Whats authority in real life vs ecelebs "authority"

[Sustacel250]

In real life, institutions that focus on authority are religious ones. For instance I was dumbing down the situation, heres my model: right wing focuses on the problem of violence, left focuses on power and religion on authority. I would say is a balance of different interests, normies are naturally drawn to get into things they are predisposed to care for.

I got into social status topics as an incel. Other incels got into "looks is everything" because they are romantic idealists. Others instead got into religion and ideology because they want rule and order. Its all in the predispositions and genetic biases.

Well in the situation with authority in real life you need a source usually. Recognized source not invented. For example the source can be god, scriptures or apostolic succession. That sort of thing. So what happens is a priest does not wakes up one day and decides he has authority. Is the reverse, the institution creates a priest and he is authorized to do several things. They give him rituals and education and so on. After that, the priest can go tell normies how to live, he can slap the kid of someone else or tell a woman to change her attitudes.

In western world instead authority works by mandate. So these semitic superstitions when they are westernized they focus on doctrine moral teaching and voluntary submission. Because authority in the west works only if people recognize is legit. For instance the various ecelebs on the conservative side invented a new ideology lately. They invented that we collectively become "gods" by following jesus on social media, you may hear nick fuentes saying it, or jordan peterson or bigtech. these people are privy to the new ideology they invented. The big idea they have is you choose to act as if jesus exists, so you make it exist in this world. I dumbed it down.

The issue I have is ecelebs have no ordination and no institutional mandate and I dont respect them. They are not accountable as well and have no stable doctrine. what I summarized just earlier is my TLDR but the issue is these ecelebs are not asked to study formally, so nothing grants you they understand the information the same way or enough to communicate it with us. What will happen is 10 ecelebs understand bits of the info on their own and not very well. They have no obligation to care for people they "advise" and they are estranged and detached from ordinary life. No eceleb knows what is like to earn money fairly, because they live payed by retards on the internet and get donations and corruptions from foreign states.

Ecelebs are not legit. They follow no tradition for instance. They have no legal or rational legitimacy they can say "the rules say I can do this", but the rules didnt say it. They have "charisma" because they think "people feel I should lead" or "people feel my same way". But this is an illusion. Populists are never a majority they are not even 10% they are a small subset. What they feel is an echo chamber on the internet and in any case their feelings are not reality. I would quote ben shapiro here "your feelings dont mean shit fuck you". Rules and law mean something, your feels on the internet dont.

So you end up with the massive contradiction. COnservatives keep saying they believe in rules and order and hierarchy. But in reality they dont, they believe in something else. They believe in twitter personalities, they think they can self appoint or moralize aggressively without a mandate. No responsibility. They have the morality of plebeians in a nutshell. This is not aristocracy.