https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... tudy-shows
The Guardian has a leftwing feministy agenda
And even they admit that the more free sexual selection choice women have had, the more short men have been genocided
Even the fucking Guardian admits that women's free choice has meant short men's genocide
- General Alek
- Master Sergeant

- Reactions:
- Posts: 2775
- Joined: 23 May 2024, 20:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Autism is God
- Darth_aurelius
- Captain

- Reactions:
- Posts: 3369
- Joined: 07 May 2024, 18:17
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
General Alek wrote: 25 Nov 2025, 10:34 https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 ... tudy-shows
The Guardian has a leftwing feministy agenda
And even they admit that the more free sexual selection choice women have had, the more short men have been genocided
This is reminiscent of the liberal and leftist publications in Weimar Germany conceding that the jews had orchestrated a betrayal of the German armed forces and had facilitated a humiliating surrender and eventual subjugation of the Germanic peoples by the forces of proto-degeneracy (triple entente of the West). Notwithstanding their usual allegiance to and obsequiousness for their jew overlords, even the socialists and Christian democrats acknowledged that the jews had gone too far and were, by their foul and vile machinations, provoking an almighty and righteous cleansing. So too shall it be with foids once the IPF begins to emulate the glories of the NSDAP. Inshallah.
Captain, Commanding Officer and Founding Father of the Incel Movement
-
Sustacel250
- Reactions:
- Posts: 751
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
i pondered many times of my supposed genetic inferiority being myself a manlet.
I mean my body is capable and im able bodied, i got 20/20 eyesight and perfect physical shape (did boxing when I was younger for 9 years) and so on. Nobody bullied me, on the contrary they called me to resolve disputes.
One thing I think gives an advantage to tall people is that nowadays thanks to steroids they can fill the gap we manlets had as an advantage. basically a tall person has to work more in the gym to achieve big muscles. Us manlets instead grow muscles super fast, for example franco columbu (a manlet) was short and looked like a mac donald turkey. Arnold had to sweat more and start training very very young.
We manlets are fast muscle growers but today the tall chads have filled the gap thanks to roids. Modern life indeed gives the chads this and other advantages but to go as far as to say we manlets are "Inferior". I really dont agree. I dont think we are inferior.
Penis size isnt even correlated with height by the way. In the gym seen tons of chads with inferior equipment compared to me. One thing I can say tho, being taller absolutely matters in fights. It also allows tall people to see far into the distance. So yeah being tall is a definite advantage. On this basis alone I would say height is still not enough to determine someone "genetically inferior". So why not also discriminating vs cripples, and mentally disabled people? I mean, why us manlets have to get discriminated is my question. And why based on height alone?
I mean my body is capable and im able bodied, i got 20/20 eyesight and perfect physical shape (did boxing when I was younger for 9 years) and so on. Nobody bullied me, on the contrary they called me to resolve disputes.
One thing I think gives an advantage to tall people is that nowadays thanks to steroids they can fill the gap we manlets had as an advantage. basically a tall person has to work more in the gym to achieve big muscles. Us manlets instead grow muscles super fast, for example franco columbu (a manlet) was short and looked like a mac donald turkey. Arnold had to sweat more and start training very very young.
We manlets are fast muscle growers but today the tall chads have filled the gap thanks to roids. Modern life indeed gives the chads this and other advantages but to go as far as to say we manlets are "Inferior". I really dont agree. I dont think we are inferior.
Penis size isnt even correlated with height by the way. In the gym seen tons of chads with inferior equipment compared to me. One thing I can say tho, being taller absolutely matters in fights. It also allows tall people to see far into the distance. So yeah being tall is a definite advantage. On this basis alone I would say height is still not enough to determine someone "genetically inferior". So why not also discriminating vs cripples, and mentally disabled people? I mean, why us manlets have to get discriminated is my question. And why based on height alone?
- Massimo
- Reactions:
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 11 Jun 2024, 12:55
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
I don't have muscle.Sustacel250 wrote: 25 Nov 2025, 11:13 i pondered many times of my supposed genetic inferiority being myself a manlet.
I mean my body is capable and im able bodied, i got 20/20 eyesight and perfect physical shape (did boxing when I was younger for 9 years) and so on. Nobody bullied me, on the contrary they called me to resolve disputes.
One thing I think gives an advantage to tall people is that nowadays thanks to steroids they can fill the gap we manlets had as an advantage. basically a tall person has to work more in the gym to achieve big muscles. Us manlets instead grow muscles super fast, for example franco columbu (a manlet) was short and looked like a mac donald turkey. Arnold had to sweat more and start training very very young.
We manlets are fast muscle growers but today the tall chads have filled the gap thanks to roids. Modern life indeed gives the chads this and other advantages but to go as far as to say we manlets are "Inferior". I really dont agree. I dont think we are inferior.
Penis size isnt even correlated with height by the way. In the gym seen tons of chads with inferior equipment compared to me. One thing I can say tho, being taller absolutely matters in fights. It also allows tall people to see far into the distance. So yeah being tall is a definite advantage. On this basis alone I would say height is still not enough to determine someone "genetically inferior". So why not also discriminating vs cripples, and mentally disabled people? I mean, why us manlets have to get discriminated is my question. And why based on height alone?
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
