Why evil exists no satisfying answer

[Massimo]

https://www.religiousforums.com/threads ... st.291465/

[Tovarishcel]

wtf is religous forum

[Sustacel250]

I dont know im not into religion but I think people define as evil, things that differ. I was into these topics about jews and indians and other primitive barbarians. I noticed jews define evil as something done against a jew and they dont bat an eye when the sme thing is done to a non-jew. Or also I seen indians who think evil is when someone disrespects them. Mafia thinks like indians they make a big deal out of "respect".

In america, mafia culture comes from southern italians and southern italians are called "wop" or "guido" because tey have 98% arab DNA so they have a morality of the arab which is all about backstabbing and secluding in a family and try to fuck over anyone around them.

Basically I think is settled, morailty is a genetic bias. In my perspective the most moral of all are the anglo and germans, the least moral are the arabs, in the middle theres black people.

In this context theres various definitions of "evil", I dont think the religions define it very well. I am inclined to not like bible for example, I consider it super immoral. Lots of the bible expresses this arab morality that in my perception is very evil. Obviously in the bible there is also superior western morality from objectively superior greek thinkers that fixes a lot that arab immoral sand desert genetic bias.

[KingDavid]

https://www.religiousforums.com/threads ... st.291465/

I agree they have no satisfying answer. A bunch of stupid and ignorant atheists blaming God for shit. Ironic cause the website is called “religious forums.”

The real answer is in Genesis chapter 3 in the Bible. Basically Satan tricked Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit and they got kicked out of the Garden of Eden. That’s what brought sin/evil into this world.

[KingDavid]

I dont know im not into religion but I think people define as evil, things that differ. I was into these topics about jews and indians and other primitive barbarians. I noticed jews define evil as something done against a jew and they dont bat an eye when the sme thing is done to a non-jew. Or also I seen indians who think evil is when someone disrespects them. Mafia thinks like indians they make a big deal out of "respect".

In america, mafia culture comes from southern italians and southern italians are called "wop" or "guido" because tey have 98% arab DNA so they have a morality of the arab which is all about backstabbing and secluding in a family and try to fuck over anyone around them.

Basically I think is settled, morailty is a genetic bias. In my perspective the most moral of all are the anglo and germans, the least moral are the arabs, in the middle theres black people.

In this context theres various definitions of "evil", I dont think the religions define it very well. I am inclined to not like bible for example, I consider it super immoral. Lots of the bible expresses this arab morality that in my perception is very evil. Obviously in the bible there is also superior western morality from objectively superior greek thinkers that fixes a lot that arab immoral sand desert genetic bias.

Bro Jews are not a good example for morality. Their Talmud says it’s ok to murder, rape, defraud etc. non Jews. The Christian Bible says you have to treat everyone equally and treat everyone good love your enemy and love your neighbor.

[Darth_aurelius]

https://www.religiousforums.com/threads ... st.291465/

I can tell you that if you are beseeching religious texts or the dogmatic injunctions which emanate from them then you are looking in the wrong place for the answer to the question of why evil exists. You need only comprehend the rudimentary dynamics of human evolution, biological adaptation and behaviors that have been ingrained through hundreds of thousands of years of natural selection.

Humans are imperfectly evolved primates and our species is less then one chromosome away from chimpanzees and it shows. We have a strong, biologically hard wired predilection to engage in violence in furtherance of consummating procreative sexual relations so as to perpetuate our genetic template. The evolution of philosophy, and I would argue that religion is one form of philosophical teaching, has modulated and ameliorated our intrinsically bestial nature but the extent to which the civilizing influence of intellectual mentation and personal edification can tame the more savage propensities depends on the individual and their susceptibility to the things which make us virtuous.

[Massimo]

I dont know im not into religion but I think people define as evil, things that differ. I was into these topics about jews and indians and other primitive barbarians. I noticed jews define evil as something done against a jew and they dont bat an eye when the sme thing is done to a non-jew. Or also I seen indians who think evil is when someone disrespects them. Mafia thinks like indians they make a big deal out of "respect".

In america, mafia culture comes from southern italians and southern italians are called "wop" or "guido" because tey have 98% arab DNA so they have a morality of the arab which is all about backstabbing and secluding in a family and try to fuck over anyone around them.

Basically I think is settled, morailty is a genetic bias. In my perspective the most moral of all are the anglo and germans, the least moral are the arabs, in the middle theres black people.

In this context theres various definitions of "evil", I dont think the religions define it very well. I am inclined to not like bible for example, I consider it super immoral. Lots of the bible expresses this arab morality that in my perception is very evil. Obviously in the bible there is also superior western morality from objectively superior greek thinkers that fixes a lot that arab immoral sand desert genetic bias.

You are wrong about most Southern Italians having mostly Arab mixture.

[Massimo]

https://www.religiousforums.com/threads ... st.291465/

I can tell you that if you are beseeching religious texts or the dogmatic injunctions which emanate from them then you are looking in the wrong place for the answer to the question of why evil exists. You need only comprehend the rudimentary dynamics of human evolution, biological adaptation and behaviors that have been ingrained through hundreds of thousands of years of natural selection.

Humans are imperfectly evolved primates and our species is less then one chromosome away from chimpanzees and it shows. We have a strong, biologically hard wired predilection to engage in violence in furtherance of consummating procreative sexual relations so as to perpetuate our genetic template. The evolution of philosophy, and I would argue that religion is one form of philosophical teaching, has modulated and ameliorated our intrinsically bestial nature but the extent to which the civilizing influence of intellectual mentation and personal edification can tame the more savage propensities depends on the individual and their susceptibility to the things which make us virtuous.

Interesting view even though I don't believe that evolution is true or that humans are animals.

[Darth_aurelius]

https://www.religiousforums.com/threads ... st.291465/

I can tell you that if you are beseeching religious texts or the dogmatic injunctions which emanate from them then you are looking in the wrong place for the answer to the question of why evil exists. You need only comprehend the rudimentary dynamics of human evolution, biological adaptation and behaviors that have been ingrained through hundreds of thousands of years of natural selection.

Humans are imperfectly evolved primates and our species is less then one chromosome away from chimpanzees and it shows. We have a strong, biologically hard wired predilection to engage in violence in furtherance of consummating procreative sexual relations so as to perpetuate our genetic template. The evolution of philosophy, and I would argue that religion is one form of philosophical teaching, has modulated and ameliorated our intrinsically bestial nature but the extent to which the civilizing influence of intellectual mentation and personal edification can tame the more savage propensities depends on the individual and their susceptibility to the things which make us virtuous.

Interesting view even though I don't believe that evolution is true or that humans are animals.

Well the preponderance of incontrovertible scientific evidence is on the side of those who assert that evolution, biological adaptation and natural selection have facilitated the development of the human species. There are also no intellectually coherent competing propositions that have any adequate explanatory force to them, hence we must accept the best available theory.

[Massimo]

I can tell you that if you are beseeching religious texts or the dogmatic injunctions which emanate from them then you are looking in the wrong place for the answer to the question of why evil exists. You need only comprehend the rudimentary dynamics of human evolution, biological adaptation and behaviors that have been ingrained through hundreds of thousands of years of natural selection.

Humans are imperfectly evolved primates and our species is less then one chromosome away from chimpanzees and it shows. We have a strong, biologically hard wired predilection to engage in violence in furtherance of consummating procreative sexual relations so as to perpetuate our genetic template. The evolution of philosophy, and I would argue that religion is one form of philosophical teaching, has modulated and ameliorated our intrinsically bestial nature but the extent to which the civilizing influence of intellectual mentation and personal edification can tame the more savage propensities depends on the individual and their susceptibility to the things which make us virtuous.

Interesting view even though I don't believe that evolution is true or that humans are animals.

Well the preponderance of incontrovertible scientific evidence is on the side of those who assert that evolution, biological adaptation and natural selection have facilitated the development of the human species. There are also no intellectually coherent competing propositions that have any adequate explanatory force to them, hence we must accept the best available theory.

I disagree there is some evidence for evolution but there's also the possibility that it is biased for one thing we don't know if the transitional fossil bones are fake and we don't know for sure if they are transitional bones they could just be an extinct version of a type of human or a type of primate not a combination of the two and furthermore the universe and everything in it could have been intelligently designed by a creator.

[VH911]

Interesting view even though I don't believe that evolution is true or that humans are animals.

Well the preponderance of incontrovertible scientific evidence is on the side of those who assert that evolution, biological adaptation and natural selection have facilitated the development of the human species. There are also no intellectually coherent competing propositions that have any adequate explanatory force to them, hence we must accept the best available theory.

I disagree there is some evidence for evolution but there's also the possibility that it is biased for one thing we don't know if the transitional fossil bones are fake and we don't know for sure if they are transitional bones they could just be an extinct version of a type of human or a type of primate not a combination of the two and furthermore the universe and everything in it could have been intelligently designed by a creator.

Evolution definitely exists.

[Massimo]

Well the preponderance of incontrovertible scientific evidence is on the side of those who assert that evolution, biological adaptation and natural selection have facilitated the development of the human species. There are also no intellectually coherent competing propositions that have any adequate explanatory force to them, hence we must accept the best available theory.

I disagree there is some evidence for evolution but there's also the possibility that it is biased for one thing we don't know if the transitional fossil bones are fake and we don't know for sure if they are transitional bones they could just be an extinct version of a type of human or a type of primate not a combination of the two and furthermore the universe and everything in it could have been intelligently designed by a creator.

Evolution definitely exists.

Because you say so.

[Darth_aurelius]

I disagree there is some evidence for evolution but there's also the possibility that it is biased for one thing we don't know if the transitional fossil bones are fake and we don't know for sure if they are transitional bones they could just be an extinct version of a type of human or a type of primate not a combination of the two and furthermore the universe and everything in it could have been intelligently designed by a creator.

Evolution definitely exists.

Because you say so.

While I agree with his assertion, he is too intellectually lazy to substantiate his claims as per usual so I will just say that the reason men of science, learning and empiricism like VH and I ascribe to evolutionary theory is because of the cumulative weight of the evidence that supports its claims.

Like any other hypothesis, one must approach it on the basis of the credibility, the veracity and the factual support for whatever it happens to rely upon by weigh of argument. Darwin posited a process of natural selection and biological adaptation which was able to account for the sea shells that had hitherto been inexplicably observed in certain rock formations. The genetic relationships between evolutionarily similar organisms that derived from a common ancestor have since been confirmed as have the degree to which such animals are divergent both on the basis of the fossil record as well as similarities in the genome. Competing hypotheses are insufficiently corroborated or rely upon spurious assumptions and/or contrived interpretations of fact.