It's not worth it getting in a public discussion with someone who is better looking than you

[Pour_Lui]

The Greeks already knew this with the sophists and rherotic. Socrates correctly argues that a physician will have better arguments in medicine than whoever studied rhetoric, and the cook will have better arguments on cuisine than the rherotician, and so on. The narrow expert, who knows how to do something and apply a technique, will always have the superior arguments; but if those two were to have a public discussion, then the public who are laymen will tend to side with whoever is trained in persuasion and fooling clueless people, while trained audience members will side with the expert.

The problem is, the vast majority of people are stupid in general, so they will side with whoever pleases them the most and looks and presents themselves like their preconceived stereotypes. If you are ugly you can argue 100% correctly about everything and people will just consider you to be an autistic childish geek, while they will always side with a better looking men or women.

That's why stuff like oofy doofy theory, dark triad theory and koinophilia theory lose to lookist theory, because the lookism section of the blackpill has better looking people and more normies, so they are the ones who get most media representation, while others are considered autistic and get banned.

[Homelesscel]

normies will always pick on your looks/height/ whatever when you're discussing yet still claim those very things they use against you don't matter.

[Sustacel250]

A friend of mine lawyer says he uses authority arguments all the time and it works. ANd he also teaches kids aged 13 to do it. It seems to work.

But I firmly believe that the first most important rhetorical figure is repetition. For instance anaphora, parallelism or antithesis are all "repetition in another manner"

So repeating contents is surely the most effective figure of speech.

Also yes, being symmetrical can lead people to trust you. All good looking people are symmetrical as well. But its not all about being chad, because rounder faces get trusted more. Theres women with a face that looks kinda like a fish and they get trusted by slimes and simps and boomers.

the open huge eyes also make you trustworthy. Childlike zoomers with thin legs get trusted even if they are ugly.

Other than that yeah I think people will listen more to good looking speakers. I dont find it super tragic simply because I dont think is all looks. For instance read anton lavey, in the intro of his book he shows the wife he got. his wife is hot. He is ugly as shit.

Imagine anton lavey on a dating app, hes bald ugly hooked crooked jewish nose, he looks goofy and he writes on the profile "circus worker" or "crime scene photographer" (his previous job) and women just skip him. THey think hes a creepy paedo-looking normie.

Instead, imagine he goes on a dating app with satanist logos, swastikas, edited pics of his face with goats and cutthroat animals, blck and white edgy pics. Yeah he will get pussy and a lot of pussy, the pussy will also be top quality.

Overall I dont claim to have "a method" for this shit. on the internet a lot of desperate people are eager to mimic anything they see working. I dont think you can make it work, for example I cannot make it work either even if I know this stuff exists. I dont even want to make it work. All im saying is its much more complex than just looks alone. Even if is true that looks is super important.