Futurism, Accelerationism, and Abolishing Women

[Fiber Optic Kommando]

"We will glorify war—the world's only hygiene—militarism, patriotism, the destructive gesture of freedom-bringers, beautiful ideas worth dying for, and scorn for woman." - F.T. Marinetti, Founder of Futurism

What are our opinions on such ideologies and do you take them seriously? When I speak of acceleration I mean both kinds (technological acceleration and the more well known concept of accelerating to collapse society.) I believe all of these ideas are concepts that could be very helpful in forming a larger, more unified political ideal for inceldom.

How should one go by "abolishing women?" Through restricting their lackluster tendencies? Enforced transition. I'm curious.

[Sustacel250]

As for marinetti specifically I took seriously another stance about art. I agree we should burn all churches, all museums, all arts, tear down all statues, destroy all music, destroy all graffiti and all expressions and demolish all buildings and so on.

Why? well I think we are in a situation where the past is a weight we cannot carry and I noticed many normies get educated in art history, by talking to them in the museum I noticed they cannot draw a straight line, cannot draw a circle but they talk about art anyway as if they know something. They do know the word "perspective" they use it often in their speech but do they ever use it for something? Or we have architects who cannot draw and just use autocad. In the past instead everyone could draw. Theres several beautiful drawings of architecture out there, nowadays all you have is cad files.

Nobody learns art, nobody cares about art. All normies care about "contemporary art" let me use this concept for the time being. Of the past, we just inherited -isms and all gets interpreted as an ideology also traditional-ism. I suffer this shit. All we get are repetitive boring mechanical behaviors nobody explains why they exist. We lost the reason behind all our actions. Its like karate for example or these stupid asian postures in martial arts. Karate became a set of movements all ritual. maybe at one point in time these movements in karate had a purpose and they were deadly but today is just a stupid ritual where a normie gets a belt if he performs bunch of movements. In karate theres handicapped people with a "Black belt" and old people woh posture as deadly masters but they have less cmbat ability compared to a teenager or a polish woman.

Maybe at one point in time karate meant something, and these movements were not supposed to be performed in front of a jury but they were deadly moves for specific usages. Who truly knows. But what remained is a dead cult of ashes, a form of savagery basically.

So I agreed with Marinetti on art at least, it would be glorious if we could just burn it all get rid of it all. And maybe make new one that finally will express something.

[Sustacel250]

What are our opinions on such ideologies and do you take them seriously? When I speak of acceleration I mean both kinds (technological acceleration and the more well known concept of accelerating to collapse society.) I believe all of these ideas are concepts that could be very helpful in forming a larger, more unified political ideal for inceldom.

Well im not super expert on it. On the general subject I would say I disagree with accelerationism as diagnosis method. It does not seems to be accurate, they look to me like doctors of the past who were used to recommend enema to any patient for any illness and were offended if a younger doctor came with a more accurate study or a more accurate diagnosis.

A thing I can notice however is that times change and nowadays the word "accelerationism" belongs to the right wing and is expressed by various personalities like nick land unabomber and so on. I wrote a shitpost about unabomber by the way. What they do is coopt the past accelerationist doomerist communist post industrial movements, its almost a copy and paste. But they inject right wing romanticism in it to make it appear different or novel. This sort of posture is then communicated on the internet to new generations who experience it for the first time.

In my case I have a broader familiarity with the discussion. But im not expert, dont take me for an expert because accelerationism as I said seems to me an inaccurate diagnosis. And I also see political aims in it. I dont think is a neutral analysis that wants to be accurate, I see accelerationism more like a doctrine to follow to achieve specific ends. I end up also disagreeing with it, for instance why would I be anti western or why would I want to cause a collapse on purpose. And are there really conditions for a collapse? Seems so if you listen to some people but I dont think is so soon as they say. So if you want to know my position is im prowest and I totally disagree with the topic of "collapse of the west".

If these communists were proved wrong, the next to be proved wrong will be the right wing inheritors of their ideas.