I like generalization

Talk about anything unrelated to men's rights
Post Reply
Sustacel250
Reactions:
Posts: 1332
Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43

IPF Service Award

Activity Award Medal

I mean normies call it "generalization". In a nutshell this idea you can think categories and so on. I find it mundane for me is also a tradition of the west, we tend to reason in that manner. We basically use a system where we say "the trees" or "the park" or the forest" or "the oaks" or "that specific oak", and is all mundane and anyone learns to use what normies call "generalization".

I also noticed a problem that comes with it, is the normie basically misuses generalization. For instance normies say "all niggers do it" and they remain unable to account for individual blacks who are capable of something the generality they were following was not accounting for. So the correct way would be to fix the generalization switch definitions, maintain the attitude and move on. Its super simple, greek thinkers were able to generalize effectively for a long time and its not a "rigid mentality" at all. Its quite flexible and functional.

Normies instead think of "fixed beliefs", so they are maybe taught specific things about life or categories like when they listen to alex jones about "the globalists" that is a super gross stupid mistake they do often. They start imagining "the globalists" and they dont even exist the way alex jones tells them. some normies go nuts and call someone "a globalist" because alex jones didnt even explain how to identify a globalist he will mostly show pics of democrat party members or transmit anger and emotions. No explanation just pure savagery.

So our educators noticed this tendency of normies to be basically jungle savages who generalize and treat each other as part of an invented category, and they told normies to stop doing it. But instead of teaching normies the proper way, we resorted to ban the entire practice. Perhaps was the sanest thing to do. I too think normies are unreasonable fools who cannot be educated. The optimal thing is to deny and ban. So for example with law we deny ban and prohibit a ton of behaviors. Even behaviors that would be useful like carrying a knife or a gun are banned in a lot of places. You could protest and say "but why banning something, "if normies hurt themselves is not my problem". I get it, sucks to live with inferior savages who hurt themselves and you pay the price for it.

Its also similar with marijuana, its illegal because some normies abuse it. Some normie moms go online saying their son died of consumption of a specific drug "therefore" we have to ban it. Just because her genetically inferior son hurts himself I cannot enjoy a drug for recreational purposes. it is assumed I will consume drugs the way a normie does: in a group, to boost my sociosexual status, to prove my "in group" in front of womn and to feel cool. How about this: i consume drugs alone in an incel setting and no woman sees me and I dont enjoy shamanism experience so I prefer to do it alone and I cause no trouble and I dont support mafia and I dont do anything illegal and I hurt myself at most.

But, due to normies being unable to process information properly I get to suffer and Iget deprivations. About the idea of using what normies call "generalization" I can do it properly. I dont have to be inflexible like "all trannies are bad" or "all women do this" or "all chads do that" or "all men want this". Normies do it, I dont. My mind is totally able to account for exceptions and situations where my general "rules of thumb" do not work.

I also noticed its a thingn in porn animation: a ton of normies I instructed were not able to invent solutions without ready methods or they were rigid and would apply same tools or same method to any project. I tried to teach normies "general principles" to make them able to tackle the vastness of porn animation instances. But I noticed soon the normies were not responsive and had only troubles. I resorted to give them pipelines to follow or tested methods that "always work" (or almost always). This is what they do also in science, they will not teach science to a normie who enters media and communication university, they will teach sort of a "dumbed down" variant to follow that includes specific instructions and tested methods. But they will teach science in a physics university, and teach it well.

It works also in other areas of life. For instance, fascism did not teach the whole philosophy and didnt justify anything to a normie, but they give instead a small booklet that describes the behavior of a fascist very precisely, to ensure a normie never gets to squeeze his braincells and he can have a simple direction to follow: forward. A simple command is all a normie needs. Same with communism, you dont teach it, you just spread emotional understandings of the whole situation like "we are against the rich" or "tax the rich" is a common slogan.

Normies in a nutshell abuse the idea of "generalization" but they abuse pretty much anything they touch to the point if you dont put severe restrictions on their behavior you will quickly regret it.
Post Reply

Create an account or sign in to join the discussion

You need to be a member in order to post a reply

Create an account

Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute

Register

Sign in