Defending rape destroys inceldom.

[Sustacel250]

Its mostly based on a self refuting position: https://mensrights.space/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3906

I think if incel redpillers keep defening rape, they build their argument on a self refuting position, its like they build the condition to destroy inceldom. Because they will justify also (with their same logic) a harsh and just punishment of incels.

If a behavior evolved or occurred in nature, its natural, therefore is acceptable.

This is the first redpiller incel logical step.

But if you apply that incel redpill logic consistently, then it applies to anything that evolved. Once you show something "evolved from", then its automatically valid in the incel redpill self-refuting logic.

Normies will react instinctively, they will punish aggressors, they will protect foid members and protect young boy anuses and exclude dangerous individuals or individuals the media portrays as "dangerous". Its all built upon the false logic of the redpilled incel.

And so, since the human race "evolved" institutions like law and social stigma and imprisonment and defense of the foids, the incels will have no other way out but to scream "cope".

When they scream "cope" it means they lost ground and they have nothing else to say, they lost the battle for logical coherency and they scream. Incel claim "behavior X is acceptable because it evolved from Y" But, an opposing behavior Z is also natural when it manifests in response to the incel behavior X. Therefore the argument cannot decide anything, except the result of a battle.
An incel will attack, a normie will defend. Who wins decides what is true. Simple as.