People who organize the right always fail. Coincidence?

[Sustacel250]

You have to show me someone that organized the right successfully. Because there aint one.

I was reading metapolitics wiki, written by these right wing masonries. Some of that info also informed anders breivik, he quoted some of it in his manifesto.

It was told by them that the right was failing, one fiasco after another. I have read of how they tried to organize the punk scene, how later they had to provide jobs to street failures, how they made them become bouncers simply to give them something to do. I was reading that australian dude thomas sewell, he also tries so very hard to give them jobs he was promising jobs at construction work, and local gas distribution.

The metapolitical project was reframing the quest for dominance, they wanted to rethink the strategy. I believe it was jonathan bowden the one who came up with the "cultured thug" idea. He wanted a new man, someone able to retain his instincts (be a thug) but also combine the erudition necessary to become a champion of the west. Bowden admitted in the richard spencer show that he did go in the masonries developing the "new right", however I am not sure hes a doctrinal member maybe just a motivator life coach. He was called "shaman" by edward dutton.

Now lets observe the right wing more broadly, outside of these fringe groups. We can see the right succeeded when they had margaret tatcher, reagan, the nouvelle droite has success. I mean this is mainstream BS. And maybe you can insert trump too in this discourse. The normies are very quick to call people "fascist" but none of these people is fascist. What succeeds isnt the fringe group, and fringes collapse "on their own" without any intervention from intelligence agencies.

So basically mainstream right can work, fringe right cant.

Now why is the case? I dont know. But I listened to people with experience. Richard Spencer says right wing is a shit magnet, despite the efforts to attract highIQ people they always get he worst elements of society, motivated by the delusion they will rape people in the streets one day. Curt Dooltittle says "you cant get past the mouth-breathers, they want to feel in a specific way, even if you are elite and you descend to help them they will reject you".
Augustus sol invictus said "Im done with these mother-fuckers" bcause they were insulting his family of mixed latinos and causing him problems.

Who succeeds instead is nick fuentes. Why? simply because he says things boomers accept, he talks to the boomers with a comfortable jargon, he speaks good of christianity, he takes all the boomer donations. Nick is playing it safe, playing the mainstream right in the successful predictable comfortable manner. He only pretends he is "censored" or "victim", while hes one of the richest in his age bracket. Comfy life makes you win.

So why do these people fail? is it for lack of self awareness? I dont think so they seem perfectly aware of their own flaws and they reported them accurately on metapolitics wiki. Yet despite of that, they never make it. If they can accurately describe their own flaws, and they do accurately create solutions, what is it then that limits them? FUnding? no they have it, and quite substantial amounts. Whats the thing that limits them?

They keep getting low quality recruits, mother-fuckers, rapists, gollums, scoundrels who are nazi unemployable. Why is that? Do they lack academia representation? I dont think they lack it.