Legality surround "creep shots" explained

[SonOfElliotRodger]

It is perfectly legal as you are being politically incorrect.

You have every right to engage in this behavior as allowed by the law.

I am from the U.S. and do this legally.

In case any comrades are wondering what legal statues surround photographing people in public stand.

[Darth_aurelius]

It is perfectly legal as you are being politically incorrect.

You have every right to engage in this behavior as allowed by the law.

I am from the U.S. and do this legally.

In case any comrades are wondering what legal statues surround photographing people in public stand.

There is more legal nuance elucidated by relevant case law on this issue then is betrayed by a Google search my comrade and I will have to go over this with you during our next staff briefing but yes, generally speaking, there is no expectation of privacy and thus no concomitant right to recover damages for infringement on ones privacy when in public.

[Massimo]

If you're out in public you can film people but you can't film inside of buildings owned by corporations even if they're open to the public if they tell you no you have to either comply or you leave and if you continue and don't comply then we'll just call the cops on you and you'll get arrested or get a fine for trespassing.

[VH911]

If you're out in public you can film people but you can't film inside of buildings owned by corporations even if they're open to the public if they tell you no you have to either comply or you leave and if you continue and don't comply then we'll just call the cops on you and you'll get arrested or get a fine for trespassing.

you sound like a man with experience.

[SonOfElliotRodger]

It is perfectly legal as you are being politically incorrect.

You have every right to engage in this behavior as allowed by the law.

I am from the U.S. and do this legally.

In case any comrades are wondering what legal statues surround photographing people in public stand.

There is more legal nuance elucidated by relevant case law on this issue then is betrayed by a Google search my comrade and I will have to go over this with you during our next staff briefing but yes, generally speaking, there is no expectation of privacy and thus no concomitant right to recover damages for infringement on ones privacy when in public.

It appears as though you have changed your definition on this twice. You were first concerned about leaving the confines of legality then you seemed to be ok with it. Now its back to an area of concern.

But whatever your final opinion is on this I will have to defer to your expertise citing your legal training.

[SonOfElliotRodger]

If you're out in public you can film people but you can't film inside of buildings owned by corporations even if they're open to the public if they tell you no you have to either comply or you leave and if you continue and don't comply then we'll just call the cops on you and you'll get arrested or get a fine for trespassing.

Do you have experience or did you just google it?

I am curious.

[Darth_aurelius]

It is perfectly legal as you are being politically incorrect.

You have every right to engage in this behavior as allowed by the law.

I am from the U.S. and do this legally.

In case any comrades are wondering what legal statues surround photographing people in public stand.

There is more legal nuance elucidated by relevant case law on this issue then is betrayed by a Google search my comrade and I will have to go over this with you during our next staff briefing but yes, generally speaking, there is no expectation of privacy and thus no concomitant right to recover damages for infringement on ones privacy when in public.

It appears as though you have changed your definition on this twice. You were first concerned about leaving the confines of legality then you seemed to be ok with it. Now its back to an area of concern.

But whatever your final opinion is on this I will have to defer to your expertise citing your legal training.

No you are mistaken. I didn't change my opinion on this as I have always been of the same opinion which is that it may be technically legal but it is something I would never personally do nor encourage others to do as it straddles the fine line between innocuous and legal conduct and that which could qualify as harassment. Even if it doesn't constitute actual harassment, it may be enough to provoke the interest of law enforcement which I am at pains to avoid. But you are welcome to do as you like, just be careful when doing so.

[SonOfElliotRodger]

There is more legal nuance elucidated by relevant case law on this issue then is betrayed by a Google search my comrade and I will have to go over this with you during our next staff briefing but yes, generally speaking, there is no expectation of privacy and thus no concomitant right to recover damages for infringement on ones privacy when in public.

It appears as though you have changed your definition on this twice. You were first concerned about leaving the confines of legality then you seemed to be ok with it. Now its back to an area of concern.

But whatever your final opinion is on this I will have to defer to your expertise citing your legal training.

No you are mistaken. I didn't change my opinion on this as I have always been of the same opinion which is that it may be technically legal but it is something I would never personally do nor encourage others to do as it straddles the fine line between innocuous and legal conduct and that which could qualify as harassment. Even if it doesn't constitute actual harassment, it may be enough to provoke the interest of law enforcement which I am at pains to avoid. But you are welcome to do as you like, just be careful when doing so.

Understood.

[Massimo]

If you're out in public you can film people but you can't film inside of buildings owned by corporations even if they're open to the public if they tell you no you have to either comply or you leave and if you continue and don't comply then we'll just call the cops on you and you'll get arrested or get a fine for trespassing.

Do you have experience or did you just google it?

I am curious.

I watched first amendment auditor Videos.