Edward notices that people high IQ have less kids. But low IQ incel tards reproduce like roaches. So he concludes modern welfare states + contraception + cultural norms will lead us to the incel sewers full of ugly dumb doomers and chuds who cant get laid and its dysgenic.
Edward says universal healthcare can keep alive the dysgenic peoples, disability inclusivity can lead to the outcome that crippled losers will reproduce, normalizing contraception can lead highIQ people not breed. But he favors infertility treatment and assisted reproduction.
The framing of his book is this one: Woke people can allow us to reframe coercion, and use medical system + norms. And you can use wokes to replace explicitly declared selection with structural incentives that help the highIQ chads and deselect the lowIQ doomers.
ED pretty much demonstrated IQ is heritable. IQ strongly correlates with education income and social value. So by his changes in fertility he wishes to boost this digit upward.
IVF and reproductive technologies allow people who otherwise wouldn’t reproduce to have children, which by his framing is a method to disassociate from the idea of natural selection processes.
Here my disagreement. I believe even if most of the ed dutton science is correct. Hes doing categorical errors. Woke policies are not harming reproduction the way he presents them. Its his choice to say woke policies harm reproduction. Also wokies arent lowIQ. Its an error to assume anyone woke is lowIQ.
Thats my disagreement, simple as. Wokes arent lowIQ. Whos lowIQ is the dissident community.
I disagree bout ed dutton eugenics
-
Sustacel250
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
