which political ideology would help incels?
which political ideology incels would benefit from?

Excellent questions my comrade. I think that the answers will tend to coalesce around a similar point along the ideological continuum although I know these are different subjects that you are inquiring in to. The best ideology for purposes of governance of incels would be a form of Wahabi or Salafi inspired theocracy, somewhat analogous to what we see in the rule of the Taliban in Afghanistan whereby women are pervasively and categorically relegated to a role of subservience and subordination vis-à-vis their male overlords. Islamic fundamentalism as modulated by an autocratic rule by an enlightened despot would be maximally conducive to both the preservation of traditional values as well as the personal satisfaction and flourishing of incel men.Roxzm wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 16:23 which political ideology is the best for incels to live in?
which political ideology would help incels?
which political ideology incels would benefit from?
![]()
I would agree with the first proposal but not the second. I don't think a monarchy is really conducive to creating a sort of meritocratic system which we ought to strive towards and where advancement is predicated exclusively on ability, education, intelligence, loyalty or some combination thereof. Unless you mean to say a monarchy that isn't hereditary but that would just be another way of saying that you would want an autocracy.TheRapist wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 21:25 Marxism-Rodgerism with zero commie BS and with a sole focus on a truly phalocentric monarchy.
Oh the last thing I mean was a TRUE PATRIARCHY, where only males get to lead society and women stay indoors either shitting and raising kids or just shutting the hell up and opening their legs when asked and that's it.Darth_aurelius wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 21:35I would agree with the first proposal but not the second. I don't think a monarchy is really conducive to creating a sort of meritocratic system which we ought to strive towards and where advancement is predicated exclusively on ability, education, intelligence, loyalty or some combination thereof. Unless you mean to say a monarchy that isn't hereditary but that would just be another way of saying that you would want an autocracy.TheRapist wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 21:25 Marxism-Rodgerism with zero commie BS and with a sole focus on a truly phalocentric monarchy.
Well said comrade. And it is important to recall that for literally thousands of years before the Enlightenment era and the technological and quality of life advancements which it facilitated, patriarchy was regnant in almost every civilization in the world, irrespective of time and place. The intrinsic intellectual, physical and moral superiority of men was manifestly conspicuous in these pre-modern societies where women were rightfully relegated to a place of inferiority and subject status as they had such little social utility function. Only with the rise of the modern nation state and the concomitant notions of liberal democracy, rights of "man", the repudiation of Hobbesian philosophical precepts and the secularization of society have women been able to achieve a place of equality and indeed, now superiority, in relation to men. But this is an artificial system and one which does a disservice to the nature of our species and the precedent set by ten thousand years of human endeavor.TheRapist wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 21:38Oh the last thing I mean was a TRUE PATRIARCHY, where only males get to lead society and women stay indoors either shitting and raising kids or just shutting the hell up and opening their legs when asked and that's it.Darth_aurelius wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 21:35I would agree with the first proposal but not the second. I don't think a monarchy is really conducive to creating a sort of meritocratic system which we ought to strive towards and where advancement is predicated exclusively on ability, education, intelligence, loyalty or some combination thereof. Unless you mean to say a monarchy that isn't hereditary but that would just be another way of saying that you would want an autocracy.TheRapist wrote: 10 Jun 2024, 21:25 Marxism-Rodgerism with zero commie BS and with a sole focus on a truly phalocentric monarchy.
Not the boogieman pseudo patriarchy current times woketards are all blatantly against for
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute