To be quite honest I am not sure if this movement can ever really be a vehicle of politics in a recognized sense, any achievable political strategy would involve putting up broadening organizational efforts (either through fronts or coalitions) to facilitate desirable recruitment and policy goals, this would invariably and inevitably alter the original ideology into something other as newer recruits redefine the broadening movement, you can see this play out in groups like Hezbollah (not to compare their conduct which is illegal to own which is perfectly legal) who originally started out as strict Islamic fundamentalists that eventually made the transition to a broader movement defined less by this Islamic puritanism and more by a sort of Lebanese nationalism that included more Christian and secular elements joined together in resistance to the shared existential enemy Israel. There is a niche quality to the ideology of gender that effectively isolates the adherent from the rest of society, by definition you are cordoning yourself off from half of the population at the get go, and the truth is that many more of the half that you seek to enlist are dissuaded as well given the opinion of the other half in combination with the sense of ego identifying with and taking seriously a movement plainly pertaining to sexless men rather than a broader metaphysics or wider set of grievances. Historically bands of "bare branches" or otherwise unproductive men have given way to revolutionary movements, this is undeniable, but to take this fact and then make it the sole ideation of the revolution tries to turn mechanism into motivational. It is unlikely though not impossible to get people to exert themselves fanatically in furtherance of incel ideology, furthermore you must take that fanatic material which you do possess and discipline it in way which escapes mere terrorism in the manner of Alec Minasian or Elliot Rodger which only stands to further isolate the ideology from the support of the people whom you rely on in order to successfully conduct revolution in the first place. My purpose is not to demoralize anyone with this post, nor is it to make insult, this is merely what I recognize as the plain reality as I see it, that people like slyboy can immediately disregard this struggle as unserious reflects a greater characterization by the majority of society which makes the need for a more transcendent politics evidently necessary.AutumN wrote: 14 May 2026, 14:19 I'm kinda losing hope but at the same time we just got a interview uploaded by Slyboy which was huge but still we are at the same place before the video was uploaded in terms of members.
Don't get me wrong I want the forum and movement to get somewhere but it's very exhausting trying to recruitmaxx and getting them to join just for them to be inactive after 1 post..
Does anyone feel the same if yeah share your thoughts
That the movement itself is also largely constrained to online conduct is another major hindrance as there is no realistic impact that you can make by posting or making commentary alone. When you are a dissident ideologue on the internet you are quite literally engaging your adversary's (i.e. the US Gov't's) informational matrix, this makes a practicable politics nigh impossible as you are bound to be picked apart by internal security forces which take every note of everything through their total surveillance domination of the domain in question. By practicing a purely online politics real world praxis falls to the wayside as slacktivism, drama and infighting overtakes any actual potential. In order to have a successful politics you need an ability to set your interests against another through redlining, negotiation and an ability to incur costs on or gain leverage over rival parties to maintain political power.
(1)
(1)