International Brotherhood of Men

I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:28 I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:35

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:28 I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

plus a surrogate mother goes for 100k nowadays, per child, I looked it up. Also you could still get fucked in court if you don't hire a lawyer so it's a diffcult option

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:41

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:35

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:28 I’ve recently seen that there are "wombs for hire" that you can pay and send a sperm sample so you can have a kid that’s biologically yours yet the mother has no involvement in raising the child. There’s studies that show that "female led households" are detrimental to children’s development yet the inverse is not true. Single fathers raise children that tend to be equally as successful as being raised in two parent homes. Perhaps if we used this to our advantage, and used foids simply for reproduction, this could be a solution? Although it might mean taking a risk and passing on the same incel curse onto our children. Let me know if this is just nonsense

I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

plus a surrogate mother goes for 100k nowadays, per child, I looked it up. Also you could still get fucked in court if you don't hire a lawyer so it's a diffcult option

Exactly. These cunts overvalue themselves and their biological utility which itself is nothing miraculous or extraordinary and can now be replicated in a laboratory entirely independent of actual human organic material. We in the IBM seek not merely to dispossess foids of any mechanism whereby they can leverage their innate biology for gain, be in personal, pecuniary or otherwise, but also to ensure that the most disenfranchised of men are provided with equitable consideration and compensation for their having been affirmatively dispossessed of sexual access and the attendant pleasures by the capriciousness of foids and the contrivances of jews.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:46

Sumzero wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:41

Darth_aurelius wrote: 03 Mar 2025, 11:35


I commend you on a high effort and high iq inaugural first post here SSG. As to the substance of your argument, I think that is a great idea although I also believe that one of our primary grievances is the inequitable and highly non-optimal distribution of sexual access whereby chad and chad-adjacent men maintain large personal harems of top tier, Vegas model quality Stacy's whilst all others are relegated to immiserating sexual poverty. This is evocative of the Marxist-Rogerist philosophical paradigm whereby redistribution of sexual access not merely for the biological utilitarian reason you cite but also out of egalitarian considerations is analogous to the policies implemented by the great V.I. Lenin after the capitulation of the Czarist aristocracy which resulted in a more just, fair and equitable society.

plus a surrogate mother goes for 100k nowadays, per child, I looked it up. Also you could still get fucked in court if you don't hire a lawyer so it's a diffcult option

Exactly. These cunts overvalue themselves and their biological utility which itself is nothing miraculous or extraordinary and can now be replicated in a laboratory entirely independent of actual human organic material. We in the IBM seek not merely to dispossess foids of any mechanism whereby they can leverage their innate biology for gain, be in personal, pecuniary or otherwise, but also to ensure that the most disenfranchised of men are provided with equitable consideration and compensation for their having been affirmatively dispossessed of sexual access and the attendant pleasures by the capriciousness of foids and the contrivances of jews.

"These cunts overvalue themselves and their biological utility" exactly, they are soley responsible for the birth rate decline at this point and for what is now becoming the inevitable extinction to the human race.

We'll have fully artificial wombs in the near future so foids will no longer have reproductive value. We can couple this with genetic engineering to ensure the offspring are strong and with good genes.

Then women's only value will be for fucking. But soon we will also have synthetics, AI, and robotics good enough to fully replace them in that domain too.

a father couldn't raise an infant and young child

at least I couldn't

see this thread https://mensrights.space/forum/viewtopic.php?t=469

if a woman is feminine enough, she can be very useful

she can make it her job to give your son what he wants, and do the same for you aswell

she can serve while you lead

Well yeah I think if youre a very dedicated person you can do very good parenting, homeschooling and so on. But its hard because you gtta be an expert in every field. So you will probably rely on compromises like put your kid on khanacademy. Maybe you can send kids to military schools so they learn methods to defend against normies.

I think in the future, most education will be easy accessble on the internet and kids will need more to learn team tactics and how to beat down bullies. The menace in society will mostly be normies who receive subpair education and think "antisemitism" is real because they hear it repeated online.

Overall it can be done. I also got some exp on this topic since i was legal tutor of my niece and shes super prosocial now and she has great achievement in society. If she was left to a woman she would be a bimbo doll whore by now, and we would be here spending money to send her to the drug rehab center and pay multitudes of psychologists to "understand her" and pay for unwanted pregnancies with thugs who promised her social media relevancy as an onlyfans whore.