Page 1 of 1
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 15:49
by whiteingale
there is no morality. morality is created of fear but I wish for you to stay true to virtue brothers. Don't be merciful but not merciless!!!!!
only through pain humans understand each other, but that is not really possible by kindness. it is not
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 15:51
by Tovarishcel
whiteingale wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 15:49
only through pain humans understand each other,
that is absolutely true, this is why our movement exists and comrades ahve strong bond because they all understand each other pain
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 16:42
by AmonGoeth
Although morality is ultimately a spook, an illusive social construct that only exists in the minds of men, it is nonetheless a useful and necessary tool to control the ape-like normie NPCs and sustain an orderly society.
One of our core missions is to re-educate degenerate western foids into chaste, virtuous housewives. Whether my propaganda or by beating them into submission.
And per your title a proper civilization must have monogamy, as one chad hoarding all the women will inevitably lead to revolution and discontent such that only small-scale tribal villages can exist. We are witnessing the deevolution of society as more and more men are left out of the mating pool and are thus choosing to atomize and isolate themselves in their neet caves to let society collapse under its own hubris inshAllah.
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 16:45
by AmonGoeth
whiteingale wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 15:49
only through pain humans understand each other, but that is not really possible by kindness. it is not
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 11 Mar 2025, 19:36
by VH911
and the reason for that were the first big organized wars.
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 11:18
by whiteingale
VH911 wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 19:36
and the reason for that were the first big organized wars.
n0t exactly. it was because the power was in the hands of the rich who manipulated other men to fight wars. but the rich would get the women, not the men who fought, these would be more dead
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 11:19
by whiteingale
PoodankMcGee wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 16:42
Although morality is ultimately a spook, an illusive social construct that only exists in the minds of men, it is nonetheless a useful and necessary tool to control the ape-like normie NPCs and sustain an orderly society.
One of our core missions is to re-educate degenerate western foids into chaste, virtuous housewives. Whether my propaganda or by beating them into submission.
And per your title a proper civilization must have monogamy, as one chad hoarding all the women will inevitably lead to revolution and discontent such that only small-scale tribal villages can exist. We are witnessing the deevolution of society as more and more men are left out of the mating pool and are thus choosing to atomize and isolate themselves in their neet caves to let society collapse under its own hubris inshAllah.
the pain picrel posted is my ideology already so
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 11:21
by whiteingale
they cannot be reeduted unless you literaly are frieza power level, they have quantity and overall advantage. the only way to defeat the normies is by constantly targeting all things they're afraid of, beginning with hints of what they value "morally". so to speak, whatever anyway
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 11:24
by whiteingale
Also, I don' want really society to recover tbh.....
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 11:28
by whiteingale
I don't think these people deserve recover.
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 13:20
by VH911
whiteingale wrote: 12 Mar 2025, 11:18
VH911 wrote: 11 Mar 2025, 19:36
and the reason for that were the first big organized wars.
n0t exactly. it was because the power was in the hands of the rich who manipulated other men to fight wars. but the rich would get the women, not the men who fought, these would be more dead
there was a study that came to the conclusion that it was the winning groups that took the women of the losing groups, which resulted in this situation.
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 13:58
by whiteingale
no way, its not so simple very often the way it works is that rich men take women but gaslight men to fight wars for them, that is the reality of it.
in 4000 bc 1 out of 17 men had sex with all women
Posted: 12 Mar 2025, 14:05
by Eremetic
whiteingale wrote: 12 Mar 2025, 13:58
no way, its not so simple very often the way it works is that rich men take women but gaslight men to fight wars for them, that is the reality of it.
How'd you get yellow colour