International Brotherhood of Men

If you only need to convince two people about something, focus on building a strong relationship with them, understanding their perspectives, and tailoring your message to their specific needs and concerns. It's about creating an environment of trust and mutual understanding.
Here's a more detailed breakdown:
1. Understanding Their Needs and Concerns:

Listen actively:
Pay close attention to what they say, both verbally and nonverbally, to understand their values, motivations, and any hesitations they might have.
Ask clarifying questions:
Don't assume you understand their position. Seek clarification to ensure you're addressing the right issues.
Be empathetic:
Try to see things from their perspective, even if you don't agree with them. This can help build rapport and show that you value their opinions.

2. Building a Strong Relationship:

Be honest and transparent:
Share your thoughts and feelings openly, while also being respectful of their views.
Show that you care about their well-being:
Small gestures of kindness and support can go a long way in building trust.
Find common ground:
Look for areas where your perspectives overlap, even if there are significant differences in other areas.

3. Tailoring Your Message:

Focus on their specific needs: Avoid generic arguments. Instead, tailor your message to address their particular concerns and motivations.
Use clear and concise language: Avoid jargon or technical terms that they might not understand.
Present your arguments logically and persuasively: Use evidence and examples to support your claims, but avoid being overly aggressive or confrontational.

4. Be Patient and Persistent:

Change takes time:
It's unlikely that they will immediately agree with your point of view. Be patient and persistent, while also being willing to compromise.
Don't give up easily:
If you're truly committed to convincing them, don't give up after a few attempts. Keep trying to build a strong relationship and find common ground.

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:39 You only need to convince 2 People of our Cause.

If these 2 People then do the same at some Point a huge Group will be created.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:41

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:39 You only need to convince 2 People of our Cause.

If these 2 People then do the same at some Point a huge Group will be created.

Yeah, the first is Master and the second is Fat Link. But you're talking about principles of exponentiation which only works if you assume that the chain of persuasion remains unbroken and that is a patently wrong assumption considering our record.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:42 Also, that block text looks like something that ChatGPT generated.

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:48

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:41

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:39 You only need to convince 2 People of our Cause.

If these 2 People then do the same at some Point a huge Group will be created.

Yeah, the first is Master and the second is Fat Link. But you're talking about principles of exponentiation which only works if you assume that the chain of persuasion remains unbroken and that is a patently wrong assumption considering our record.

The Idea is to convince 2 People because then the Chain will not be broken if someone just convinces 1 instead of 2 once.
Also for this Strategy it's important that these People are 100% convinced, not just partially. The idea is about focusing the energy on convincing 2 People completely.
And Master etc, are not the People you need to convince in this case. If you had read the Site i showed you, you knew that it needs to start with People lower in the hierarchy. Master etc. will join later when the movement has become bigger.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:42 Also, that block text looks like something that ChatGPT generated.

Yes, it is.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 14:02

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:48

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:41


Yeah, the first is Master and the second is Fat Link. But you're talking about principles of exponentiation which only works if you assume that the chain of persuasion remains unbroken and that is a patently wrong assumption considering our record.

The Idea is to convince 2 People because then the Chain will not be broken if someone just convinces 1 instead of 2 once.
Also for this Strategy it's important that these People are 100% convinced, not just partially. The idea is about focusing the energy on convincing 2 People completely.
And Master etc, are not the People you need to convince in this case. If you had read the Site i showed you, you knew that it needs to start with People lower in the hierarchy. Master etc. will join later when the movement has become bigger.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:42 Also, that block text looks like something that ChatGPT generated.

Yes, it is.

At the time I was formulating my initial post to your OP you hadn't actually included that text below which is precisely why I responded a second time with my comments regarding my suspicion that this was GPT derived. We can talk about theoretical and hypothetical scenarios but ultimately it is going to be action and not words which will inspire comrades to join us and will enable us to achieve the critical mass of members that we need before we implement the next stage of our grand strategic plan. Also, ChatGPT is not the oracle of sagacious wisdom that many people seem to think it is and as it relies too heavily on data inputs that originate with npc tier normies whose thought processes are corrupted both by their low iq and their inculcation in a culture of degeneracy.

~~"You begin saving the world by saving one man at a time; all else is grandiose romanticism or politics."

-Charles Bukowski

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 14:10

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 14:02

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 13:48

The Idea is to convince 2 People because then the Chain will not be broken if someone just convinces 1 instead of 2 once.
Also for this Strategy it's important that these People are 100% convinced, not just partially. The idea is about focusing the energy on convincing 2 People completely.
And Master etc, are not the People you need to convince in this case. If you had read the Site i showed you, you knew that it needs to start with People lower in the hierarchy. Master etc. will join later when the movement has become bigger.


Yes, it is.

At the time I was formulating my initial post to your OP you hadn't actually included that text below which is precisely why I responded a second time with my comments regarding my suspicion that this was GPT derived. We can talk about theoretical and hypothetical scenarios but ultimately it is going to be action and not words which will inspire comrades to join us and will enable us to achieve the critical mass of members that we need before we implement the next stage of our grand strategic plan. Also, ChatGPT is not the oracle of sagacious wisdom that many people seem to think it is and as it relies too heavily on data inputs that originate with npc tier normies whose thought processes are corrupted both by their low iq and their inculcation in a culture of degeneracy.

Yes, this Strategy only applies to normal recruits here anyway, it was only intended to be for you so that you know about this Strategy, you can tell it to our Members.
And i only copy pasted this AI generated text, because in this case it gave a detailed explanation, but it's true.

For the part that you can't convince Master, I meant the URL I sent on the Element Chat, but it's also included in the original post now.

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 14:26

VH911 wrote: 28 May 2025, 14:10

Darth_aurelius wrote: 28 May 2025, 14:02


At the time I was formulating my initial post to your OP you hadn't actually included that text below which is precisely why I responded a second time with my comments regarding my suspicion that this was GPT derived. We can talk about theoretical and hypothetical scenarios but ultimately it is going to be action and not words which will inspire comrades to join us and will enable us to achieve the critical mass of members that we need before we implement the next stage of our grand strategic plan. Also, ChatGPT is not the oracle of sagacious wisdom that many people seem to think it is and as it relies too heavily on data inputs that originate with npc tier normies whose thought processes are corrupted both by their low iq and their inculcation in a culture of degeneracy.

Yes, this Strategy only applies to normal recruits here anyway, it was only intended to be for you so that you know about this Strategy, you can tell it to our Members.
And i only copy pasted this AI generated text, because in this case it gave a detailed explanation, but it's true.

For the part that you can't convince Master, I meant the URL I sent on the Element Chat, but it's also included in the original post now.

And I may have misapprehended your original meaning when I first replied as I took you to mean that if there were only two people who you needed to convince or who you could conceivably convince, who would they have been. If that was in fact the proposal then I would still say Master and FL since being able to operate with complete impunity on .is would result in a total paradigm shift in the incelosphere and we would supersede them in numbers and renown overnight.