International Brotherhood of Men

For instance I was very romantic idealistic. I was thinking it was a good idea to empower the common man and what fascinated me the most was success in schooling during 60s. I was thinking yeah common man if properly educated can go and compete with managerial class an do better.

Or I was thinking the existence of elites is an affront and i wanted direct democracy. Laugh at me if you want.

Over the years, instead I noticed whats the reality. I noticed with the populist movements of the 2000s what really is the truth about normies: they are immoral savages.

I was already into what is called "elite theory" which is my favorite political science. But it was only some years ago I realized elites are right and we were misled.

The thing is, common men are immoral savages. Sure, maybe one or 2 in a classroom of highschool is worth salvaging or retrieving and sending him to a good school, but the rest of the classroom really is worthless.

And elites are already doing it. In a nutshell, in every university they allow smart people to study free. Normies instead pay. What happens is if youre good the university gives you lodging, and at times they also pay you to study. Companies already go in schools to find te smart people preemptively. Nvidia, google, amazon, banking institutions and NSA and so on go to university and search the smart kids, and they incentivize them in all sorts of ways. They give them money, or contracts or jobs to do.

The deficient normies instead go school and pay exorbitant prices to "study" and get a false title they rarely complete. And when normies "study" they retain very little info, and normies mostly care of social status so they are not even that much serious about getting into subjects. Normies can be used as paypigs for sustaining the smart ones, which is what is happening in any university.

In any universtiy 80% are retarded scum useless normie paypigs. There are going to be non-normies who study for free, or get payed. And is already working.

In a nutshell what we have to do is select people and separate normies into an underclass, give them cope booze and video games and occupy their time. So we separate them. from time to time we give normies a dopamine release like BLM or antifa, to allow these inferiors to express their savagery in a controlled manner. Or we mind program them into "political activation" so they become accustomed to the idea of "the protest" or "the movement" or "the utopia". We can teach communism, socialism whatever to these savage brutal normies and send them to "do the protest" periodically so they unleash the dopamine in a constant cycle.

I dont know, tavistock is at it. Im not a behavioral psychologist. But more or less this is what should happen: separate normies from non-normies and handle the inferiors as if they are animals. Its already happening. Nobody will ever complain.

Exactly, I already posted a thread more or less like this, that says maybe the incel revolution already happened and it's called capitalism, because to me it almost seems like we are elites who were born outside the elite and this is the root of our suffering. I think normie/neurotypicals are really THE PROBLEM with this world, not some elite, in fact the elite are performing miracles, it's insane that the world is somewhat functional given how fucking retarded and immoral the average normie is.

Pour_Lui wrote: 20 Jan 2026, 04:54 Exactly, I already posted a thread more or less like this, that says maybe the incel revolution already happened and it's called capitalism, because to me it almost seems like we are elites who were born outside the elite and this is the root of our suffering. I think normie/neurotypicals are really THE PROBLEM with this world, not some elite, in fact the elite are performing miracles, it's insane that the world is somewhat functional given how fucking retarded and immoral the average normie is.

interesting thoughts I will avoid to comment about my idea about "capitalism" I think is not real but I dont want to sidetrack the discussion. I do agree, but I do find elites to be problematic in many ways. But the issue is if we dont have a counter-elite the idea of giving power to normies should be discarded. Also, these so called "elites" almost emerged on their own. Even the famed rothschild family (i have read their history) didnt always have this level of power, it was built with intention. And I would say if a normie was inspired by the rothschild he could achieve some level of improvement perhaps not nearly as much as the rothschild did but surely thy would improve.

The problem is normies dont want to admit it, and they dont want to improve. What mde me especially idealistic is simply that I live in an area of my country that has a history of socialist success. I mean, this place is unique in the whole world and I realized it late. We had (and still have) a culture of prosocial entrepreneurs like for example one of them was going around giving families of normies machines to work at home and he created a giant textile industry and now the city where he lived hosts the second most important textile engineering course in whole EU.

And also, a tech dude named olivetti, he created a culture of support of families, normies would have 3 kids and be able to brng them near work, he reduced working hours improved it all. Another dude named leumann built an entire village for normies wthout a house and it has a nice architecture is not a shit communal housing.

But these are just few examples, is realy the whole culture around these events that makes it work.

What I realized later is these movements of normie improvement were working, not because immaterial principles of "improvement" are right but because of hyper specific circumstances. For instance in other countries socialism brought ruin and devastation. And we also observed with the social experiment of mass schooling that a huge portion of normies does not wants to study.

THis idea the common man wants to study was a big thing in EU and everyone was fired up about it. Priests and educators and masons opened schools everywhere and they were all emphatic thinking common man will improve if we give him means. It didnt happen when we got close to 100% literacy.

Internet also is a massive social experiment. At first people built libraries and gutemberg book project. What we noticed later is internet took off truly only after fecesbook and social media. Normies didnt read, normie didnt study even if they have access to the greatest library humanity ever seen.

After the result of these failed social experiments like printing press (failed) internet (failed) and now also AI (failed too), I want to draw some conclusions. I dont want to go around repeating a failed experiment forever. I say we have gathered enough data already to conclude this: normies are all scum and we should abandon the idea of improving them. Instead we should study how to manipulate them like china does with electronics. Or like NSA and american education. Similar but better. We have to divide retard from non-retard. And we have a new mission now, we have to save the few intelligent ones from the savagery of their peers and sometimes also from their own family. We need to save the few who can be saved or want to be saved. And the rest can fuck off and die.