Page 1 of 1
Did Hitler/Nazis really view Slavs as subhuman?
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 00:29
by TruAlphaMale
According to “historians” they were, but honestly, I don’t think that’s true. I myself am Slavic. I am Polish and Montenegrin. I feel as if Slavs are very much Aryan since your average Pole has blonde hair, blue eyes, white skin, or any other Aryan feature. I have some of these features as well. Now, I am not a Nazi but I do tend to interact with Neo-Nazi content and I want to feel less guilty about it. By the way the, no Nazis have ever killed anyone in my family bloodline, like ever. Not to mention the amount of Neo-Nazi/white supremacy groups in Poland or whatever Slavic country.
So anyways, can someone answer my question? Can I get specifically Darth Aurelius to answer this question since I know he has experience with this type of stuff?
Someone tag Darth Aurelius.
Did Hitler/Nazis really view Slavs as subhuman?
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 01:43
by femcelpussyeater
There's neo nazi groups everywhere... so you can't really use that logic to justify being a nazi or feeling less guilty.
And to answer your question yes slavs were seen as
untermensch
But just because they were seen as beneath the aryans doesn't mean they specifically hated you guys, I mean the
nazis and the indians became 'allies' in WWII
Did Hitler/Nazis really view Slavs as subhuman?
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 01:45
by Comrade Exile
the nazi were not against Slavs they allied themselves with Slavic fascists such as ante pavelic the leader of the croatian fascist government and the iron guard who were the romania fascist party so no they did not see them as subhuman
Did Hitler/Nazis really view Slavs as subhuman?
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 01:49
by femcelpussyeater
Comrade Exile wrote: 16 Apr 2026, 01:45
the nazi were not against Slavs they allied themselves with Slavic fascists such as ante pavelic the leader of the croatian fascist government and the iron guard who were the romania fascist party so no they did not see them as subhuman
Same with Indische Legion but with that logic you’re implying that the nazis regarded the Indians as their equals which isn't supported by their racial ideologies
Did Hitler/Nazis really view Slavs as subhuman?
Posted: 16 Apr 2026, 02:52
by Sustacel250
I listened to lots of nazis. The way Thomas Sewell frames it is like this: he wants whites to expand and conquer everything push slavs outward so they conquer other peoples. Its more like an excuse to justify the idea of taking the lands of the slavs in my view.
During andrew anglin era, the nazis were calling them "slavniggers" and they were cheering their death welcoming a new war so "slavniggers die its a positive thing" they were writing it often on 4chan. the psyops can be recycled to pursue various objectives.
As for my opinion from readin mein kampf, I think simply hitler was constructing a political propaganda piece to make it seem as if all success of slavs came from german leaders and he made it appear as if slavs governed by germans are great and all. What is it? political propaganda, others do the same and present the idea slavs under jewish russians are great. Whatever, this genre is called "political propaganda".
For sure the slav question is a complicated one. If you listen to contemporary nazis they will present to you various digressions and reinterpretations in a way to excuse the actions of hitler. We in conspiracy scene call them "the hitler fanclub". Basically they are adults who suffer from the disease of cult following and they believe ecelebs.