Stuff about tranny "science"
Posted: 01 May 2026, 04:58
I think talkin to random people on discord is superior compared to reading sociology paper. Because on sociology papers I noticed at times studies are conducted on 15 peoples or 43. And these people are from the same place, same classroom, learned the same textbooks.
Also authors of tranny science I noticed tend to project and perform self-analysis.
Like, theres some tranny scholars who reason like this: they analyze themselves, talk abut their fetish, dreams, aspirations, social needs and ways in which they coped with problems, they derive from this personal analysis a global worldview assuming everyone else is like them, they jump to conclusions too early, assume their thinking pattern is universal, or they frankly seem simply solipsistic morons at times.
So they create descriptions my brother called "forced psycho analysis" he meant that they force us (the readers) to be spectator psycho-therapists but they wont pay us. We (the readers) are forced in a twisted sick perverted game to be the observers of a deranged freak who is building a talk to an imaginary spectator rather than doing science. So we get to become intimate with the thoughts of a weird faggot with absurd sexual fetishes. This bullshit belongs to literature and romance, or if you want to do it go to the therapist and pay with your own money.
I went to them, articulated a case saying I deserve a paycheck, lets not pretend im not an active part in the therapy they are performing. But other than the sense of injustice I feel when I read these fraudsters with fake academia titles, I also think they are broken people who arent suited for science.
its cool to use the tools of psychology and science to fix your broken life, however I think if you want to be a scholar you owe us some seriousness and have some class, science is not your toy.
We shouldnt be so indulgent, we should judge tranny science more harshly. Too much compassion is bad. One thing is saying "ok bro youre a broken human, lets observe a vow of silence to give you some dignity", but I dont want this to come at the cost of ruining the institutions and the principles founded on science.
Another criticism that could come at me is psychology more or less is all made this way, and theres always quacks like freud and jung and all these shitheads like jordan peterson who perform BS ted talks with the swindled normie masses. Thats cool, but there are limits. There is a place for everything. I would say your mental diarrhea belongs to the confessional room with the priest or the life coach or the therapist.
Also authors of tranny science I noticed tend to project and perform self-analysis.
Like, theres some tranny scholars who reason like this: they analyze themselves, talk abut their fetish, dreams, aspirations, social needs and ways in which they coped with problems, they derive from this personal analysis a global worldview assuming everyone else is like them, they jump to conclusions too early, assume their thinking pattern is universal, or they frankly seem simply solipsistic morons at times.
So they create descriptions my brother called "forced psycho analysis" he meant that they force us (the readers) to be spectator psycho-therapists but they wont pay us. We (the readers) are forced in a twisted sick perverted game to be the observers of a deranged freak who is building a talk to an imaginary spectator rather than doing science. So we get to become intimate with the thoughts of a weird faggot with absurd sexual fetishes. This bullshit belongs to literature and romance, or if you want to do it go to the therapist and pay with your own money.
I went to them, articulated a case saying I deserve a paycheck, lets not pretend im not an active part in the therapy they are performing. But other than the sense of injustice I feel when I read these fraudsters with fake academia titles, I also think they are broken people who arent suited for science.
its cool to use the tools of psychology and science to fix your broken life, however I think if you want to be a scholar you owe us some seriousness and have some class, science is not your toy.
We shouldnt be so indulgent, we should judge tranny science more harshly. Too much compassion is bad. One thing is saying "ok bro youre a broken human, lets observe a vow of silence to give you some dignity", but I dont want this to come at the cost of ruining the institutions and the principles founded on science.
Another criticism that could come at me is psychology more or less is all made this way, and theres always quacks like freud and jung and all these shitheads like jordan peterson who perform BS ted talks with the swindled normie masses. Thats cool, but there are limits. There is a place for everything. I would say your mental diarrhea belongs to the confessional room with the priest or the life coach or the therapist.