Women are erasing us from existence.
Posted: 12 May 2026, 06:15
https://www.npr.org/2026/05/10/nx-s1-58 ... le-mothers
To me, single mom has some flaws as a model. But is in full scale promotion at the present time.
Imagine if the mother wants a kid for fashionable reasons instagrammable or shes after the fulfillment of one of her desires or shes after a social identity "the mother". Many of these identities are also induced thru excess consumption of mass media, so we get high chance the kid will be narrativized and be object of these identities of their moms. Moms have been persuaded thru narrative and delusion to pursue all sorts of identities, and they always impose them on the kids, and without any male presence that goes against the woman we can assume the strongest cultural force will be female.
Another issue is, it lessens male power and influence, and it can be good or bad depend how you see it. I mean, I agree if your only option in life is get a MAGA-tard, i would rather die than allow him to inseminate me if I was a woman. Or if your only option is getting some fucking asshole into rap listening or a doomer, then yes totally is best to ask help to a jizzbank. I dont think is bad to deselect dysgenic losers coming from the boomercon TV watcher dysgenic revolution. The dysgenic revolution of boomer reproduction caused the contemporary problem of nick fuentes idolaters and zoomtoking.
The jizzbank idea can also be used to promote eugenics. So we spam brad pitt DNA genes altered and boost human IQ. What mother would want her kid to be diseased and ill, I think they will be easily persuaded to take brad pitt DNA and their motherhood experience will only benefit from it. Bcause happy healthy mentally sane and moral kids always make motherhood better lived and full of good memories.
Anotehr potential drawback I can see is that women rely too much on expanded bureaucracy and welfare systems. These things are assumed to be existing, and inheritance can become a problem as well. I mean, what I hope is women take this idea very seriously, and they dont just accept solutions as offered, and they put forward some idea that allows them to not give too much power to state or church. History taught us once women are owning property a great centralization is about to occur. Church acquired that power thru this method. Give women resources, step 2 take it from them.
Also, kids raised by girls will basically "belong to the state", you have also this problem to solve.
We need to formulate an incel response. I say we have to redirect all incel discourse to talk about bio-engineering and achieving methods to suppress the dysgenic boomer revolution but not expand welfare to do it. We have the same enemy: the doomers. But we need an incel response to remove all chuds and all doomers without paying the cost of having communism.
To me, single mom has some flaws as a model. But is in full scale promotion at the present time.
Imagine if the mother wants a kid for fashionable reasons instagrammable or shes after the fulfillment of one of her desires or shes after a social identity "the mother". Many of these identities are also induced thru excess consumption of mass media, so we get high chance the kid will be narrativized and be object of these identities of their moms. Moms have been persuaded thru narrative and delusion to pursue all sorts of identities, and they always impose them on the kids, and without any male presence that goes against the woman we can assume the strongest cultural force will be female.
Another issue is, it lessens male power and influence, and it can be good or bad depend how you see it. I mean, I agree if your only option in life is get a MAGA-tard, i would rather die than allow him to inseminate me if I was a woman. Or if your only option is getting some fucking asshole into rap listening or a doomer, then yes totally is best to ask help to a jizzbank. I dont think is bad to deselect dysgenic losers coming from the boomercon TV watcher dysgenic revolution. The dysgenic revolution of boomer reproduction caused the contemporary problem of nick fuentes idolaters and zoomtoking.
The jizzbank idea can also be used to promote eugenics. So we spam brad pitt DNA genes altered and boost human IQ. What mother would want her kid to be diseased and ill, I think they will be easily persuaded to take brad pitt DNA and their motherhood experience will only benefit from it. Bcause happy healthy mentally sane and moral kids always make motherhood better lived and full of good memories.
Anotehr potential drawback I can see is that women rely too much on expanded bureaucracy and welfare systems. These things are assumed to be existing, and inheritance can become a problem as well. I mean, what I hope is women take this idea very seriously, and they dont just accept solutions as offered, and they put forward some idea that allows them to not give too much power to state or church. History taught us once women are owning property a great centralization is about to occur. Church acquired that power thru this method. Give women resources, step 2 take it from them.
Also, kids raised by girls will basically "belong to the state", you have also this problem to solve.
We need to formulate an incel response. I say we have to redirect all incel discourse to talk about bio-engineering and achieving methods to suppress the dysgenic boomer revolution but not expand welfare to do it. We have the same enemy: the doomers. But we need an incel response to remove all chuds and all doomers without paying the cost of having communism.