incels.is works with feds

[TerminatoFoid]

More proof for you guys that incels.is works with feds and will get you arrested....

Not first time their users get interviewed by law enforcement...

Their admin publicly said they contacted law enforcement. They don't hide it.

[Darth_aurelius]

More proof for you guys that incels.is works with feds and will get you arrested....

Not first time their users get interviewed by law enforcement...

Their admin publicly said they contacted law enforcement. They don't hide it.

Excellent post comrade. As if there wasn't already a super abundance of incontrovertible proofs that those simp nigger faggot fakecels are actively collaborating with federal, state and local law enforcement. Some of the comrades here have also been the target of investigations, including myself when an undercover officer attempted to infiltrate the IPF by approaching me in the gym last year and then more recently when I was followed by state police in an unmarked car to a local Chaldean take-out place.

The difference between the noble comrades here and those complicit little snitch cunts on incels.is is that we don't cooperate with law enforcement and actively mock and ridicule the police for their amateurish and incompetent methods, whereas the admins on .is help facilitate investigations into incels accused of making online threats or conspiring to engage in some manner of criminal activity.

There are innumerable examples of former .is members being investigated, indicted, arrested and eventually, convicted due to the information provided by the site management. In contrast to those duplicitous simp bitches, we here have the fortitude of Mujahedeen warriors and the loyalty of SS storm troopers.

Thank you for sharing this information and for making what is essentially a public service announcement to our comrades.

[Darth_aurelius]

More proof for you guys that incels.is works with feds and will get you arrested....

Not first time their users get interviewed by law enforcement...

Their admin publicly said they contacted law enforcement. They don't hide it.

I should have included this in my response above but, incidentally, welcome back to the forums brother, it has been far too long since I have had the pleasure of reading your edifying post content and the honor of engaging with you here. As you can see from our recent activity here, these forums have been growing substantially since your last tour of duty and new comrades continue to flock to the inspiring black Caliphate like banners of the mighty IPF every day to join their brothers in revolutionary incel AK-47 arms.

[Tovarishcel]

honestly thank god im not in your cucked US or EU countries, they will never come or try to talk to me

[Darth_aurelius]

honestly thank god im not in your cucked US or EU countries, they will never come or try to talk to me

FSB, Militia, Red Army and IPF Soviet Guard Division would cut them down with AKM and AK-74 fire if they tried.

[Sustacel250]

Curiously wikipedia has some useful info about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctione ... hatgpt.com

45 deaths of people sent to sanctioned suicide. According to wikipedia at least.

Another thing I noticed is that when joker movie came out, no incel cared about it. I didnt care, nobody cared. Journalists started to associate joker-incel. After months, incels were saying joker is an incel movie. It had to be told to them by journalists. Incels did not do it on their own. Basically, first they release the joker movie, then they put the narrative that incels are interested in joker (lie demonstrable), then they say they will start using incel terminology in this one and other articles to patrol the incels.

The timeline: joker movie. Step 2 journalists talk about it. Step 3 incels talk about it. Incels were the third step in this timeline. Incels did not affiliate with joker before journalists said it. This tells me its a proof the narrative about incels is owned by the media, not by us. We are not defining ourselves, the media defines us. It has to be fixed, we need to define ourself first.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-monitor-v ... d=66031356

[Vincent]

This is the reason by the way why I will be a lot more careful with my posts. I may also slightly alter some of my old posts. Where I live, there is no real freedom of speech, unfortunately. For the record, I haven't said anything illegal.

[Sustacel250]

Good reasoning guys. But I let you know during 2019 where it was exposed the FBI-cels, nobody cared at the time, but they knew about it. Some incels in that platform left it for another one. Know how many? Only one.

The rest stayed there. Why? I suspect is because they want to be edgy and the media and FBI gives you means to be edgy. I listened to an interview with a proud boy dude, and he sad "i dont care, I want to be cool" or something like that. People knew that proud boy is a disgusting fed infested community, its just that it touches some emotional chords like for example camaraderie and being tough with men and having weapons and such.

Or, people can go and tell Andrew tate community or tucker carlson "hey yo youre all under CIA surveilance". They know it, trust me, they know tucker father was CIA and adrew tate father as well. People know alex jones is a CIA because he said it himself in numerous occasions. Do they care? No, because these peopl offer them the adventure of a lifetime.

Dostoevskij is right. His hypothesis: people want to live the adventure of a lifetime. Even if things are quiet and things are good, people will want to live a story anyway, they will invent conflict if they need to, like bodybuilders invent a mental conflict that is not real and have heroism narratives... all they are doing: lift weights, there is no herosim there no sacrifice. All in their heads, because people want this stuff.

So my explanation is that people just want to be edgy. People will never give a shit about being watched by FBI so long FBI lets them be edgy. People love GDL (goy defense league) even if it glows in the dark, because they say "fuck jews" in public. Its so cool, man. I loved as well when I was teenager, to be edgy is what I like.

So if we have to react to it, it is necessary to find a way to be edgy. But legally, not be fucked over by FBI. Compete and give people what they want: a method to be edgy and live the narrative they want to fulfill an existence.

[Darth_aurelius]

Curiously wikipedia has some useful info about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctione ... hatgpt.com

45 deaths of people sent to sanctioned suicide. According to wikipedia at least.

Another thing I noticed is that when joker movie came out, no incel cared about it. I didnt care, nobody cared. Journalists started to associate joker-incel. After months, incels were saying joker is an incel movie. It had to be told to them by journalists. Incels did not do it on their own. Basically, first they release the joker movie, then they put the narrative that incels are interested in joker (lie demonstrable), then they say they will start using incel terminology in this one and other articles to patrol the incels.

The timeline: joker movie. Step 2 journalists talk about it. Step 3 incels talk about it. Incels were the third step in this timeline. Incels did not affiliate with joker before journalists said it. This tells me its a proof the narrative about incels is owned by the media, not by us. We are not defining ourselves, the media defines us. It has to be fixed, we need to define ourself first.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-monitor-v ... d=66031356

I suspect one of the reasons why the media began associating the film with the incel sub-culture was to sensationalize it prior to and during its release in order to generate more interest in and revenue for the film. Hollywood has been doing this sort of thing for decades now and you see aspects of this on the covers of those banal and vacuous magazines that dumb foids and NPC's read such as "People" or Cosmo which feature the dietary and lifestyle choices of actors and actresses involved in a particular production or their alleged romantic involvement.

As for the film having themes which align with or convey the essence of inceldom, I personally did think that was deliberately written into the plot and that the dialogue, character development and overall narrative arc of the story was conceived of in such a way so as to resonate with individuals who either are aware of the incelosphere or are incels themselves.

The fact that the character Arthur Fleck experiences so many of the same immiserating conditions which cause so much suffering to so many comrades (e.g., living with and caring for an elderly parent, being poor, wage slaving for the kikes, being mocked, ridiculed and humiliated by random normies, being ignored or despised by foids, suffering mental illness, etc.) clearly suggests that the writers and producers must have at least been cognizant of the allegorical aspects of the film vis-à-vis incel sub-culture.

And for the record, I didn't actually learn from the media that the film was supposed to have themes which resonated with incels but rather drew those conclusions myself after having watched the movie, which I am sure any reasonably intelligent man could and would do himself.

[VH911]

Curiously wikipedia has some useful info about it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctione ... hatgpt.com

45 deaths of people sent to sanctioned suicide. According to wikipedia at least.

Another thing I noticed is that when joker movie came out, no incel cared about it. I didnt care, nobody cared. Journalists started to associate joker-incel. After months, incels were saying joker is an incel movie. It had to be told to them by journalists. Incels did not do it on their own. Basically, first they release the joker movie, then they put the narrative that incels are interested in joker (lie demonstrable), then they say they will start using incel terminology in this one and other articles to patrol the incels.

The timeline: joker movie. Step 2 journalists talk about it. Step 3 incels talk about it. Incels were the third step in this timeline. Incels did not affiliate with joker before journalists said it. This tells me its a proof the narrative about incels is owned by the media, not by us. We are not defining ourselves, the media defines us. It has to be fixed, we need to define ourself first.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/fbi-monitor-v ... d=66031356

I suspect one of the reasons why the media began associating the film with the incel sub-culture was to sensationalize it prior to and during its release in order to generate more interest in and revenue for the film. Hollywood has been doing this sort of thing for decades now and you see aspects of this on the covers of those banal and vacuous magazines that dumb foids and NPC's read such as "People" or Cosmo which feature the dietary and lifestyle choices of actors and actresses involved in a particular production or their alleged romantic involvement.

As for the film having themes which align with or convey the essence of inceldom, I personally did think that was deliberately written into the plot and that the dialogue, character development and overall narrative arc of the story was conceived of in such a way so as to resonate with individuals who either are aware of the incelosphere or are incels themselves.

The fact that the character Arthur Fleck experiences so many of the same immiserating conditions which cause so much suffering to so many comrades (e.g., living with and caring for an elderly parent, being poor, wage slaving for the kikes, being mocked, ridiculed and humiliated by random normies, being ignored or despised by foids, suffering mental illness, etc.) clearly suggests that the writers and producers must have at least been cognizant of the allegorical aspects of the film vis-à-vis incel sub-culture.

And for the record, I didn't actually learn from the media that the film was supposed to have themes which resonated with incels but rather drew those conclusions myself after having watched the movie, which I am sure any reasonably intelligent man could and would do himself.

no, it's just because they are totalitarian and they try to cause mass hysteria, and they used this movie for this.

[Sustacel250]

I suspect one of the reasons why the media began associating the film with the incel sub-culture was to sensationalize it prior to and during its release in order to generate more interest in and revenue for the film. Hollywood has been doing this sort of thing for decades now and you see aspects of this on the covers of those banal and vacuous magazines that dumb foids and NPC's read such as "People" or Cosmo which feature the dietary and lifestyle choices of actors and actresses involved in a particular production or their alleged romantic involvement.

As for the film having themes which align with or convey the essence of inceldom, I personally did think that was deliberately written into the plot and that the dialogue, character development and overall narrative arc of the story was conceived of in such a way so as to resonate with individuals who either are aware of the incelosphere or are incels themselves.

The fact that the character Arthur Fleck experiences so many of the same immiserating conditions which cause so much suffering to so many comrades (e.g., living with and caring for an elderly parent, being poor, wage slaving for the kikes, being mocked, ridiculed and humiliated by random normies, being ignored or despised by foids, suffering mental illness, etc.) clearly suggests that the writers and producers must have at least been cognizant of the allegorical aspects of the film vis-à-vis incel sub-culture.

And for the record, I didn't actually learn from the media that the film was supposed to have themes which resonated with incels but rather drew those conclusions myself after having watched the movie, which I am sure any reasonably intelligent man could and would do himself.

Yes your assumptions probably are the ones that make sense. We can assume hollywood has their research team and they produced a movie for the 2019 era. And during 2008 joker had instead to rely on post 911 media narrative so it was different. All these jokers are different due to different era and different media narrative. I get it. Till here is easy.

With this assumption we could say of course media were asked to do movie promotion and they sensationalized it with the incels and so forth. That would make sense. And who knows maybe is the truth.

But I dont thinks is all there is to it. And pardon me but im going to inject in this discussion quite a lot of conspiracies. For instance I would recommend this channel that has discussions on every "serial killer" in the scene (the ones idolized by incels). https://odysee.com/@truthhertzradio:b/V ... k-Part-1:9

The conspiracy community NEVER PROVED government involvement in any of these mass killings. Except in one case with boston marathon bombing, but that was just too obvious. I realize, because I have read some of your posts, that you are not very inclined to give credit to conspiracies, or you select some of them maybe on jews and you like them. Ok, so I am not asking you to use your time to consider other perspectives because it could be they may subtract even dozens of hours of your time. Just saying that theres a ton of errors and issues in media narratives, there are recurring themes like "guy without a girlfriend spergs out and kills", media claims it even if the guy in question did actually have a girlfriend.

Media does and wants to shape people with their hollywood programming. And to "prove it" I would have to ask again to consider the conspiracy community perspective, that as I said never has "full proof". You will never be given a detailed exposition or a record of someone programming normies with his media.

So what I propend to think is that we incels are defined by the media, we use the language the media gives us. We will be told who to be, we will find is a good idea to identify with a serial killer, we will think its something to take pride in, because we will resonate with these narratives. We are basically being played like fools is what I think.

[Sustacel250]

no, it's just because they are totalitarian and they try to cause mass hysteria, and they used this movie for this.

Think what the media did to elliot rodger. Was he incel ? NO, absolutely not.

The incel community, could be said did not even exist when ER did his thing. Sure, he was on PUA hate and people used the term incel negatively to describe ER.

At the time, I was on the web on abtreff and other "incel" (you can call them that but they werent incel) platforms that existed before the term incel was created. At the time, we called ourself like this "ugly" or "autistic" or we just didnt call ourself "Incel", some would have thought it was also offensive since most of us were not even searchin foids just hating them online.

So, ER rejected the term "incel" and I know with rhetoric you can tell me that nobody can reject it, it is who you are. Still, ER did not participate to it, did not want to be identified as incel, he schizoed out online about it because he did not see himself as incel.

The media labeled him that way regardless. So he was used by media.

I know, you can use rhetoric here. YOu can say technically he self identified as virgin, socially isolated (not really, he had university life and was followed by female coach), frustrated, got cucked by his sister, angry and rejected... basically a profile of an incel like we know it today. But he didnt participate with us, he was not with us when we were in the communities that preceeded inceldom. He chose the PUA redpill type of stuff that existed in his time. He rejected us, simple as. And media and specifically the guardian, NYT, vice, cnn and others started to use the term "incel".

During 2017 or around that time, finally the incel community takes place. incels.is born out of reddit of all places. That was because reddit at the time had big huge incel communities. Isnt it funny how it works? The media is moving us all like puppets.

[VH911]

no, it's just because they are totalitarian and they try to cause mass hysteria, and they used this movie for this.

Think what the media did to elliot rodger. Was he incel ? NO, absolutely not.

The incel community, could be said did not even exist when ER did his thing. Sure, he was on PUA hate and people used the term incel negatively to describe ER.

At the time, I was on the web on abtreff and other "incel" (you can call them that but they werent incel) platforms that existed before the term incel was created. At the time, we called ourself like this "ugly" or "autistic" or we just didnt call ourself "Incel", some would have thought it was also offensive since most of us were not even searchin foids just hating them online.

So, ER rejected the term "incel" and I know with rhetoric you can tell me that nobody can reject it, it is who you are. Still, ER did not participate to it, did not want to be identified as incel, he schizoed out online about it because he did not see himself as incel.

The media labeled him that way regardless. So he was used by media.

I know, you can use rhetoric here. YOu can say technically he self identified as virgin, socially isolated (not really, he had university life and was followed by female coach), frustrated, got cucked by his sister, angry and rejected... basically a profile of an incel like we know it today. But he didnt participate with us, he was not with us when we were in the communities that preceeded inceldom. He chose the PUA redpill type of stuff that existed in his time. He rejected us, simple as. And media and specifically the guardian, NYT, vice, cnn and others started to use the term "incel".

During 2017 or around that time, finally the incel community takes place. incels.is born out of reddit of all places. That was because reddit at the time had big huge incel communities. Isnt it funny how it works? The media is moving us all like puppets.

i did not disagree on this. but the joker movie was never intended to be something that incels would want to identify with.

[Tovarishcel]

we didnt check our official email for like year... maybe feds fags tried to contact us too

[Sustacel250]

i did not disagree on this. but the joker movie was never intended to be something that incels would want to identify with.

Well I didnt watch it because didnt care. I still didnt watch it today. But my idea is that its a movie made for creating identification and relatability. Hollywood does it all the time.

Option A: It is pandering deliberately created to be relatable and is emotionally engineered. (this is what captain thinks)
Option B: It is programming people, frames people, shapes viewers perceptions. This is what I think it is.

And of course in absence of proof, option A is the most logical one. You can tell me "you have no proof". Sure, but Ive been in incel scene, and you have no idea how many I seen who had their behaviors altered by these media narrations or how many worship serial killers, like for real. These people do create a new persona as soon as hollywood or the media targets them.

Perhaps Im just a schizo retard, ok. But its insane to think hollywood isnt brainwashing people, it absolutely does it.

[VH911]

i did not disagree on this. but the joker movie was never intended to be something that incels would want to identify with.

Well I didnt watch it because didnt care. I still didnt watch it today. But my idea is that its a movie made for creating identification and relatability. Hollywood does it all the time.

Option A: It is pandering deliberately created to be relatable and is emotionally engineered. (this is what captain thinks)
Option B: It is programming people, frames people, shapes viewers perceptions. This is what I think it is.

And of course in absence of proof, option A is the most logical one. You can tell me "you have no proof". Sure, but Ive been in incel scene, and you have no idea how many I seen who had their behaviors altered by these media narrations or how many worship serial killers, like for real. These people do create a new persona as soon as hollywood or the media targets them.

Perhaps Im just a schizo retard, ok. But its insane to think hollywood isnt brainwashing people, it absolutely does it.

of course, all modern media is meant to brainwash.

[Tovarishcel]

feds and fags