I am surrounded by normie feces on the internet since 10+ years.
I noticed chuds and doomers repeat to me narratives that I already heard 200 times, but they repeat these narratives as if the ideas they have were formed naturally inside of their own heads.
Instead of quoting the place where they got the idea, they pretend as if they had the idea on their own, and they dont even realize I heard it 200 times already.
I was dialoguing with an incel on blackpill community (that rival forum) and he started to repeat to me ideas derived from giulio ebola, not knowing that I have already read it and unlike him I was also able to criticize it. Unlike this incel, I also have language advantage (I can read giulio ebola in native tongue), I have experience with this author since more time than he.
I listened to these johnny come late ideas for decades. I already had opened a dialogue with people I call "declinist thinkers" I already developed the ideas way past this intro level the chuds and doomers present to me.
It seems to me as if they read a book, but instead of engaging the author they simply learn it as "truth of life". I wonder then, if I make them read another book will they take it too as "truth of life"? Everything they read is truth of life? Cant they engage an author instead of absorbing like a sponge all ideas ?
One way to do things would be, you write your idea and tell me the source where you got it from. If you do that, I will respect you and proceed with an exposition of why your ideas are bad or good and tell you what I agree or disagree with. If you present to me the ideas as if they emerged naturally in your head but I already heard them 200 times already, then I will not take you seriously and I will not respect you.
I think a feature of the internet is betrayed. Internet was born as a method to link every idea with sources. HTML was written with the explicit purpose of being able to link everything.
Internet is the infrastructure of computers connected together. WWW is a system of hyperlinks that connect to documents. In a nutshell internet is the culmination of the ideas of the past of gathering all knowledge and having it accessible anytime anywhere. HTML includes anchor tags, URLs and you can click and jump to a source. Jumping to sources have never been easier. In addition to that, we also have libraries that can turn your page into a nest of links splitting the page in 2 and giving access to the source.
What is internet is basically an universal information space where any document could link to any other document. The problem I see with these fucking chuds and doomers is they keep behaving as if internet never happened. Did someone explain to them what is internet? The design of the internet is made very similar to the academic citation where ideas are connected to sources. Blogs for example were linking to other blogs and link culture was working.
After the advent of social media this culture was almost destroyed, which also coincides with the rise of the doomers and chuds. I always thought all the emotional narratives of chuds and doomers are false and artificial. The chuds and doomers cannot justify their emotional depressive states in a culture of open sharing, because tey need the comfort of the gated environment. Theres always someone who refuses the emotional interpretation of the collective, which is why doomers act defensive and push away anyone who has guts to refuse teir emotional narratives. But I live their hostility as a betrayal of the internet itself.
the doomers in a nutshell rely on recycling of ideas. They rely on the turnover of people, so the doomers can present the same repackaged lie 3000 times to 3000 people without letting them know their doomer ideas have been defeated already. Its like when you talk to flat earthers, UFO retards or religious people who repeat to you the pascal wager without telling you that all these ideas have been debunked already ad nauseam.
Doomers are exactly as dishonest as the flat earther, the christian and the UFO tard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternal_September
why doomers and chuds never cite sources?
-
Sustacel250
- Posts: 1849
- Joined: 18 Jul 2025, 10:43
-
IPF Service Award
Activity Award Medal
Create an account or sign in to join the discussion
You need to be a member in order to post a reply
Create an account
Not a member? register to join our community
Members can start their own topics & subscribe to topics
It’s free and only takes a minute
