What can we say to describe it generally, I would say is a romanticization of stylized caricatures derived from mass media depictions of serial killers also known as "burger flipper killers" or "mac-killers"
Cases of violent criminals receiving admiration, or even marriage proposals from foids have been widely documented across decades. From the case of Charles manson being made popular by rolling stones in teenage culture, to the popular "true crime" community of contemporary times. Even elliot rodger got fangirls.
This one for instance is known as "elliotsupremelady" and she got youtube presence. Shes stuck idolizing ER and his aesthetic on the internet.
The feminist says: Violent men represent extreme forms of patriarchal dominance, and attraction may reflect internalized norms linking masculinity with control and intensity. A second feminist rationalization will also run cover for women, saying that we cannot generalize any woman behavior. Our observations are made invalid, the feminist says we should not judge women if they are attracted to violence.
Women getting raped has nothing to do with their attitude to be sexually aroused by violence. This is the feminist perspective, this is what they claim not me. Additionally some foid experts say that furiously masturbating serial killers allows the foids to explore danger while maintaining physical safety. So they even promote this shit.
The normie perspective: They say women are empathetic, they say women have a "nursing syndrome" or activate maternal instincts. they say women are convinced they can "change" a male by being with him. They say women are angels, and they would never find pleasure in kill and murder and their vagina does not produces slime when they see injustice torture and death. Its just that women are such angels and they are maternal and want to care for people.
"They see the good in everyone, even the worst guys" "She feels special because she reaches a side no one else can" "she thinks she can fix him" "They want to heal, not punish"
How many times we heard normies saying it? I hear it often, is their default perspective.
Enough with this dog-shit. Let me introduce a true incel perspective.
The incel perspective is to consider women inherently broken, violent creatures that express violence thru proxy. Women violence is parasytical, they get men to act violent on their behalf. Women dont "love criminals" they love the attention, the status, the glory that comes when they associate with them.
So its not empathy, women have no empathy, they are unable to feel for someone else. Also, women are attracted to sameness, this is why they disregard innovation in warfare or innovative acts of violence. Instead women focus on serial killing, the most stupid and idiotic burger flipper thing a man can do. Conformity leads to attracting women. Repeated behaviors create conformity, and reassures the woman, creating predictability reassures the woman. Conformity to the stylization and the romantic artificial personality offered by hollywood conforts women and gives them reassurance.
If you copy and paste joker, taxi driver, figh club, falling down, women will be attracted to you. And you dont even have to kill people, all you do is conform emotionally to pre-approved mandated personalities.
This is the incel perspective. It is superior. It proves personality doesn’t matter, only visibility and narrative power does